Which factor is NOT typically considered when evaluating feasible alternatives?

Which factor is NOT typically considered when evaluating feasible alternatives?

• A. Ecological factors
• B. Economic factors
• C. Social factors
• D. Political convenience

Answer: (D)

When evaluating feasible alternatives, planners typically consider ecological viability, economic viability, and social acceptability. These criteria ensure options are environmentally sound, financially reasonable, and publicly acceptable. Political feasibility is a real factor—whether an option can be implemented within laws, institutions, and political support—but political convenience is not a substantive criterion. It’s too subjective and short-sighted, whereas the other factors provide measurable, enduring bases for decision-making. So, political convenience is not typically used as a criterion.

When evaluating feasible alternatives, planners typically consider ecological viability, economic viability, and social acceptability. These criteria ensure options are environmentally sound, financially reasonable, and publicly acceptable. Political feasibility is a real factor—whether an option can be implemented within laws, institutions, and political support—but political convenience is not a substantive criterion. It’s too subjective and short-sighted, whereas the other factors provide measurable, enduring bases for decision-making. So, political convenience is not typically used as a criterion.